As Einstein said, we need a higher awareness to overcome problems created in a certain state of awareness. And when we search for absolute meanings, only the highest awareness will do

The power to create - so much prized in our society for centuries as synonymous with achievement, fame and so on. We usually equate it with powers or qualities of our brain. But the subtle system has some other truths in store.

One of the causes of the ever growing amount of anger is the giant wave of materialism we are all riding upon. For the last almost 2 centuries, acquisition instinct has become stronger and stronger and accepted as the first and most important driver of human existence.

The higher goal of most of our communication is emotional sharing and connectivity. The information part takes primacy in immediate work tasks or direct teaching, but even in those environments the performance lags behind if the emotional connection is poor.

Essentially we distinguish 2 separate sides: a cognitive, calculating and ego-oriented “right side” that lives mostly in our left brain, and an emotional, relational, imaginative and integrative “left side” that lives mainly in our right brain.

In the more general sense, the “mind” has been equated with the impalpable side of our being, what is beyond matter. Of course one needs a reasonably working body to start with, as a general principle.

But why is this seemingly peaking at this precise time ? Was there always a lot of trouble and we couldn’t see it ? Or is it indeed a tsunami of modern realities flowing all over our societies that is sweeping away our inner equilibrium ?

In a nutshell, Blake was a very enlightened presence with a great (and often rather prophetic} vision of superb artistic expression. He will always be a source of joy as well as spiritual reflection, both most needed at this time.

Thus a key fact is the ability to recognize “health” or “healthy”. Can this be done externally ? Is “healthy” the absence of identifiable disease ? Could that ever apply to psychological troubles and imbalances ? How about the social part of the WHO definition of health ?

Essentially the WHO has fully endorsed the most holistic view of “health”, completely equating it to “well-being”. Now the interesting part is that well-being is a subjective reality.